By Nancy Thorner -
Aren't two of the cardinal tenets of science open inquiry and peer review?
The FDA shamelessly attempted to stop a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to release Pfizer’s data on their experimental COVID-19 jab.
Mercola adds: In September 2021, a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the FDA to obtain the documentation used to approve Comirnaty. When, after a month, the FDA had not replied, the PHMPT sued.
In their FOIA application, the PHMPT asked the agency to expedite release of the documents — a reasonable request, considering we have no raw data and the shots are being pushed on children as young as 5 years old. FOIA guidelines include two conditions upon which a request may be expedited. One is “if the lack of expedited treatment could reasonably be expected to pose a threat to someone’s life or physical safety,” which one could easily argue is the case here. The second condition is “if there is an urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged federal government activity, if made by a person who is primarily engaged in disseminating information. This too is clearly applicable."
While it supposedly took the U.S. Food and Drug Administration 108 days to “thoroughly and completely” review the 329,000 pages of data Pfizer/BioNTech submitted to gain FDA approval for its Comirnaty COVID shot, licensed August 2, 2021, the FDA now claims it needs 55 years to release those same pages to the public (at a rate of 500 pages per month), as each page must be reviewed and sensitive information redacted.
More about the Pfizer shot
The Pfizer shot, was NOT approved, only the Comirnaty version which, strangely (or not so strangely), is “not available for use in the United States.”
Of note, a federal district court judge has rejected a claim by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine being administered under Emergency is interchangeable with Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine.
In an order issued Nov. 12 in Doe et al. v. Austin, U.S. Federal District, Judge Allen Winsor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida denied a preliminary injunction requested by 16 service members against the U.S. Military’s COVID vaccine mandate. A hearing is scheduled for Sept. 14, 2022.
However, the judge’s acknowledgment that “the DOD cannot mandate vaccines that only have an EUA” is significant for two reasons.
“One reason pertains to the difference in ingredients and manufacturing process between Pfizer’s EUA vaccine and the approved Comirnaty vaccine, and the other pertains to the legal difference between a fully licensed vaccine and an EUA vaccine”
"The latter reason would apply not just to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, but also to the vaccines produced by Moderna and Johnson & Johnson(Janssen), both of which are authorized only as EUA product. Under law, everyone has ‘right to refuse’ EUA product."
In summation: While the FDA did a massive review of Pfizer’s documents in 108 days, it now needs over 20,000 days to make these documents available to us poor, unwashed masses.
But recall the stress the FDA is under, as the FDA only has a paltry 18,000 people and an annual budget of 6 billion.
Mandated 91-page document dump
Under legal mandate, a 91-page document dump was released on the Pfizer vaccine data with alarming information on 12/3/2021.
By February of 2021, Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of death allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders. Bear in mind; this is Pfizer's own data.
“'It is estimated that approximately [REDACTED] doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorization for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021,’ the document states. ‘Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events …Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404), Italy (2,578), Germany (1913), France (1506), Portugal (866).’”
The chart, scroll down, "lists 1,223 fatal outcomes in the Relevant Cases. Interestingly, the age range with the most relevant cases was 31-50 years old, which is not the age group considered to be at high risk from COVID-19."
"It’s worth noting that by redacting the specified number of doses shipped, it becomes more difficult to assess the potential ratio of injury. Still, even without that, 42,086 reports of injury, including 1,223 fatalities, are a significant signal in and of itself, especially when you consider that the 1976 swine flu vaccine was pulled after 25 deaths."
Concluding thoughts
As Mercola summarizes: “You don’t need a fanciful imagination to comprehend what they might be hiding. It almost seems they want to make sure the responsible parties are all dead by the time the full data set is out in the open and people can be held to account for their decisions."
"Let’s hope the judge is more interested in public health than protecting the FDA’s dirty secrets.”
