By Nancy Thorner -
President Joe Biden’s Soviet-born and educated woman, Saule Omarova has been nominated to lead a key branch of the Treasury Dept. If approved, she’d be ‘Comptroller of the Currency.'
As Fox Business reported:
Saule Omarova was born in the Soviet Union in what is now called Kazakhstan and graduated from Moscow State University in 1989. She has pointed to the USSR’s practices as recently as 2019, when she tweeted about the gender pay gap, citing the USSR as a better model.
U.S. Senate Banking Committee Ranking Member Pat Toomey, R-Pa., last week, asked Omarova to turn over a copy of her thesis – in both English and the original Russian – for review by the committee no later than Oct. 13. Her thesis, titled “Karl Marx’s Economic Analysis and the Theory of Revolution in The Capital,” remains an item of interest to some members on the committee. …
Omarova had not complied with the request as of Thursday, Oct. 14, a spokesperson for Senate Banking Committee Republicans claimed.
And how convenient! Moscow State University confirms it has DESTROYED its only copy of Soviet-born Saule Omarova's dissertation on Marxism ahead of her confirmation hearing to be Biden's Comptroller of Currency.
A video has been unearthed, showing that Omarova wants traditional fuel industries to go bankrupt. Why? Because it will help America “tackle climate change.”
The Omarova video was filmed in February 2021 during a “Social Wealth Seminar” event hosted by New York's Jain Family Institute:
Omarova said: “…coal, oil and gas are troubled industries; a lot of the small players … are going to probably go bankrupt. At least, we want them to go bankrupt if we want to tackle climate change, right?”
Proving it wasn’t “a slip of the tongue,” in a second clip: Omarova said “the way we basically get rid of those carbon financiers is we starve them of their sources of capital.”
Top responses to the videos included:
- Tom Cotton (R-AR): “This unhinged socialist wants millions of Americans who work in the energy industry to go bankrupt. And Joe Biden picked her as his top banking nominee.”
- Chip Roy (R-TX): “I don’t need to fly to Glasgow to recognize crazy.”
- Steven Law, CEO Senate Leadership Fund: “Biden nominee eager to drive small operators out of business and kick the workers they employ to the curb. If we don’t stop them, Americans will pay dearly for their rigid ideology.”
Oil as an enemy?
How irresponsible and absurd of Saule Omarova and the Biden administration to want the oil industry to go bankrupt! No country can survive without oil.
For those who experienced the deep freeze in Texas, what would Omarova’s answer be for that debacle? Just remember, when your power goes out your gas tank goes dry. Theirs will not, but they will not care. It is not your well-being that is their concern.
Oil is NOT just energy. A mere 46 percent of oil is used to make gasoline. The other 54 percent of oil is used to make most over-the-counter medicines, various cleaning products, some rubber, tons of cosmetics, many lubricants and most of the world’s asphalt.
“Virtually all plastic, and every product made from or containing plastic, ultimately comes from oil. Out of every 42-gallon barrel of oil, 22.6 gallons is used to make products other than gasoline.”
What about green energy?
Green Energy Isn't So Green by CFACT was posted on March 31st, 2019.
What is CFACT? Mark Morano heads CFACT.
Although posted two year ago, the same holds true today.
Following are some important concepts from Green Energy Isn’t So Green.
- Air pollution from the burning of fossil fuels in the United States has been in steep decline since 1970. And that dramatic drop across all six pollutants the EPA classifies as dangeroustook place at the same time Americans increased their fossil fuel use by 40 percent. From 1988 to 2015 our vehicle miles traveled have more than doubled! So, as America has grown, we’ve used more fossil energy, traveled a lot more and yet the air we breathe has continued to get cleaner. That’s amazing. Check “pollutants” off the list.
- China owns 95% of the rare earth market and the Chinese government isn’t all that protective of the environment. Their mining projects are creating giant, toxic and radioactive lakes. It’s a serious problem they will be dealing with for decades. Producing solar panels and windmills requires a lot of mining for resources, especially for rare earth minerals.
- The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that natural gas, and coal use about 12 acres of land per megawatt of electricity produced. Solar and wind gobble up four and six times the amount of land, respectively, that coal and natural gas require. So, what’s so clean about that? Not much. Check “land use” off the list.
- Industrial wind and solar projects kill a lot of wildlife. Wind turbines alone are estimated to kill 600 thousand birds and a million bats annually. Wind and solar farmers can acquire an eagle “take” permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) that allows the site to participate in the nationwide killing of up to 4,200 bald eagles annually. Bats are very important to our ecosystem because they are essential to pollination,
- Wind turbines cause visual blight and have negative health impacts for the people who live around them. At the heart of Dr. Nina Pierpont’s, (New York pediatrician) study of the effects of wind turbinesin North America and Europe is that humans are affected by low-frequency noise and vibrations from wind turbines through their ear bones, like fish and other amphibians. Extended exposure can cause psychosis in susceptible persons.
- Solar + Wind in 2021 are 15% of Total Installed Capacity. And what happens when the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine? There must be back up power most likely using oil, gas, or coal.
- All energy sources and technologies have their impacts, but in the case of oil, natural gas and coal, there have been astonishing improvements over the past half-century. They are much, much cleaner and getting more so all the time.
What if global warming is driven by factors other than man-made?
In an article by James Murphy October 20, 2021: A trio of recent studies published from June through September of this year in The New American have concluded that observed warming in the first two decades of the 21st century is more likely due to increases in absorbed solar radiation than humankind’s emissions of greenhouse gases.
Kenneth Richard connected the three studies on the website NoTricksZone.
Instead of mankind’s emissions driving warming, a study released in June by Norman G. Loeb, Gregory C. Johnson, Tyler J. Thorsen, John M. Lyman, Fred G. Rose, and Seiji Kato has determined that a positive trend in Earth’s Energy Imbalance (EEI) is “primarily due to an increase in absorbed solar radiation associated with decreased reflection by clouds.”
While the study does contend that mankind’s emissions have an effect in observed warming, data shows it to be a small one. As Richard notes in NoTricksZone, "In emitted thermal radiation, [the] graph shows the greenhouse gas impact is effectively offset by the cloud influence; both factors are cancelled out by temperature changes. This leaves the increase in absorbed solar radiation shown in graph (d) due to natural variations in clouds and surface albedo (SFC) as the primary driver(s) of top-of-atmosphere (TOA) flux forcing during the last two decades.”
In reality, our collective understanding of our climate system is not at a level where climate scientists — and certainly not politicians — can simply point to man’s carbon emissions as the sole reason for climate change, either observed or projected decades in the future, no matter what the fanatics attending COP26 later this month tell you.
The outcome of COP26?
It was a bust!
COP 26 President Alok Sharma, MP hung his head and proclaimed through tears, “May I just say to all delegates, I apologize for the way this process has unfolded and I am deeply sorry.” - Watch COP 26 President tear up.
Greta Thunberg derides COP26 Climate pact: Blah, blah, blah.
Paris climate goals: zero emissions by 2050?
It is claimed that reducing carbon emissions in buildings will be critical to achieving the Paris climate goals and achieving net zero emissions by 2050. “Buildings represent 39% of global greenhouse gas emissions, including 28% in operational emissions and 11% in building materials and construction.”
“Global building floor space is projected to double by 2060 and only 3% of investment in new construction is green and efficient, locking in high emissions for decades. The renovation rate for existing buildings is barely 1%, less than a third of the rate needed to meet the Paris climate goals.”
Zero Carbon Agenda Deconstructed
Check Ice Age Farmer | Apr 6, 2021 | Podcast
"What is a zero-carbon future? What does it look like? To imagine, turn off your heater. No airports. No shipping. No animals. Perfect surveillance state. In this Ice Age Farmer special report, Christian breaks The “Absolute Zero” plan and how governments are actively taking drastic steps every day to meet these dystopian goals for Travel, Transport, Energy, Manufacturing, Recycling, and Food. We must understand the reality underneath their flowery philanthropic language: Absolute Slavery.”
Natural vs. manmade
As expressed by S. Fred Singer (now deceased) in a lecture delivered on the Hillsdale College campus on June 30, 2007, during a seminar entitled Global Warming: Man-Made or Natural?
Dr. S. Fred Singer (1924 – 2020) was among the first and most-prominent scientist in the world speaking out against global warming alarmists.
“Natural factors include continental drift and mountain-building, changes in the Earth’s orbit, volcanic eruptions, and solar variability. Different factors operate on different time scales. But on a time-scale important for human experience—a scale of decades, let’s say—solar variability may be the most important.”
In Fred Singer's reasoning: “Human-caused increases in the CO2 level are quite insignificant to climate change. Natural causes of climate change, for their part, cannot be controlled by man.
“Climate has been changing cyclically for at least a million years and has shown huge variations over geological time. Human beings have adapted well and will continue to do so."
Thorner encourages you to read Fred Singer's Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1500 years.
